About the Author

author photo

Agnes Varnum is a freelance writer, film programmer and communications manager for the Austin Film Society. She is the primary contributor to doc it out and Tribeca Film Institute's Resources.

See All Posts by This Author

Why are docs hot?

The Wild Parrots of Telegraph Hill at DocuramaToday I read a (now oldish) post by Daniel Nemet-Nejat in which he asks “why does it seem that more filmmakers are attracted to making documentaries”? He answers this question by saying that they are cheaper to produce than narrative, which I’d agree with although I’d add the caveat that while people assume they don’t cost anything if you have a digital camera and a laptop, it’s simply not so - good docs cost money to make and it’s an industry that relies heavily on the passion and willingness of doc makers to sacrifice themselves to get projects made….rant, rant, rant…

But, moving on, reason #2 is “the rules are there are no rules” because Hollywood movies are “formula” and docs aren’t - I don’t think this is correct. Hollywood films rely on 3-act structure as do docs. Just because Hollywood would prefer to put money into Excorcist III than take a chance on something more original, we can’t make blanket statements like fiction = formula, docs = original. Since docs are being made very independently, they aren’t a class of films that conform to certain norms - they get bought after they are made and the artist has had free reign to create (largely).

Effective storytelling, at least according to people who study ’story’ such as Joseph Campbell, tell us again and again that the hero’s journey satisfies something deep within the human psyche so while the details change, all stories are the same at their roots and that means whether they are crafted from nonfiction or fiction material. One of the problems docs have faced is moving beyond their social-issue-eat-your-peas perception with general audiences.

His last point is “it is a form that invites you to make a personal film.” Perhaps, but so few personal films actually make the leap to commercially popular - sure Michael Moore and Morgan Spurlock, but the other films he cites are not personal (meaning the filmmaker as part of the story) but they are initimate. That’s just good storytelling again.

I don’t mean to be contrary to Daniel’s opinions because I think that the premise that gives rise to his musings are important, but I think that understanding the rise in doc popularity, finding ways to keep it that way and how to divert more production dollars into the genre are worth exploring.

There Is 1 Response So Far. »

  1. Agnes,

    Hi. I just uncovered this via AJ Schnack’s Web site. I think your disagreements with me are salient. Admittedly, I was generalizing to make a point. Looking at the docs that find success, I think that they all either adhere to a three-act structure, are crowd pleasers, or are incendiary in some way. However, I think that the there is more freedom to make personal, risky material here. True, the cost is one reason. But, the fact that a certain topic can draw funding from interested parties. A fiction film, however, is almost impossible to fund if it does not, to some extent, adhere to the classic structure.

    Dan